{"id":971,"date":"2017-04-13T16:51:34","date_gmt":"2017-04-13T16:51:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/albanknews.com\/?p=971"},"modified":"2017-04-13T17:39:39","modified_gmt":"2017-04-13T17:39:39","slug":"house-bill-263-heads-to-the-governor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/albanknews.com\/?p=971","title":{"rendered":"House Bill 263 Heads to the Governor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>APRIL 13, 2017<\/strong> &#8211; In the midst of one of the most tumultuous weeks in the state\u2019s history, the centerpiece of the association\u2019s 2017 legislative agenda passed the Legislature and was sent to the governor\u2019s desk. <strong>House Bill 263<\/strong>, which clarifies a complicated income tax regulation that applies to multi-state financial institutions, unanimously passed the Senate on Tuesday.<\/p>\n<p>Sponsored by <strong>Rep. Ken Johnson (R-Moulton)<\/strong>, the bill was handled on the Senate floor by <strong>Sen. Clay Scofield (R-Arab)<\/strong>. After the Senate added a technical amendment on the Senate floor, the bill returned to the House of Representatives, where, thanks to the help of <strong>Rep. April Weaver (R-Alabaster)<\/strong>, the House unanimously concurred in the Senate\u2019s changes late Tuesday night.<\/p>\n<p>With that, House Bill 263 finished its legislative journey in the rarest of fashions, especially for such a complicated bill: <u>at no point in the process \u2013 the House Financial Services Committee, the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee, the House floor, or the Senate floor \u2013 did the bill receive a single \u201cno\u201d vote. <\/u>That feat, quite frankly, does not happen without some help. So in addition to aforementioned officials, it\u2019s more than appropriate for the association to thank the several key representatives and senators who had a direct hand in the bill\u2019s success: the chairmen of the House and Senate Rules Committees, <strong>Sen. Jabo Waggoner (R-Vestavia Hills) <\/strong>and <strong>Rep. Alan Boothe (R-Troy)<\/strong>, who made sure the bill had a prime position on the House and Senate Special Order Calendars; Senate Banking and Insurance Committee Chairman <strong>Sen. Slade Blackwell (R-Mountain Brook)<\/strong>, who allowed the bill to be thoroughly debated in committee; and <strong>Rep. Merika Coleman (D-Birmingham)<\/strong>, who managed the bill on the House floor in the sponsor\u2019s absence (the sponsor was ill).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Additionally, and equally as important, the association appreciates the numerous bankers who called their elected officials to advocate on behalf of the legislation. <\/strong>The importance of your role in this process cannot be overstated. Thank you for making your voices heard!<\/p>\n<p>As of this writing, the bill awaits Gov. Kay Ivey\u2019s signature. On that note, while this publication normally deals with what\u2019s happening in the legislative branch, the association would be remiss if it did not congratulate Gov. Ivey on her ascension to the governor\u2019s office. A former banker, Gov. Ivey was a member of the first graduating class of the Alabama Banking School. More recently, she enjoyed the strong support of the association during her service as state treasurer and lieutenant governor. The entire membership looks forward to the Ivey administration leading our state forward, and we wish her all the best.<\/p>\n<p>Other bills that might impact the state\u2019s banking industry include the following:<\/p>\n<p><strong>House Bill 70 <\/strong>by <strong>Rep. Bill Poole (R-Tuscaloosa)<\/strong> lowers, with a few notable exceptions, the age of majority in Alabama from 19 years to 18 years. The bill wouldn\u2019t change anything related to the criminal code\u2019s \u201cyouthful offender\u201d provisions, and it doesn\u2019t impact the age that one can legally purchase alcohol or tobacco products. But changing the age of majority likely also changes the age at which a person can, for example, enter into a loan agreement with a financial institution. The bill has been passed by the full House and now awaits approval by a Senate committee.<\/p>\n<p><strong>House Bill 138 <\/strong>by <strong>Rep. Juandalynn Givan (D-Birmingham) <\/strong>and <strong>Senate Bill 110 <\/strong>by <strong>Sen. Cam Ward (R-Alabaster)<\/strong> adopt the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act, a national uniform law that extends the traditional power of a fiduciary to manage tangible property, including management of a person\u2019s digital assets like computer files, web domains, and virtual currency (but not necessarily email, text messages, or social media). These bills were also introduced in 2016, and are a product of the Alabama Law Institute. In the last three years, this legislation, known as UFADAA, has been enacted in 22 states, including Tennessee and Florida. In 2017, it has already been introduced in a total of 17 states, including Alabama. The House bill has been favorably reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee and is in position to be voted on by the full Senate.<\/p>\n<p><strong>House Bill 159<\/strong> by <strong>Rep. Patricia Todd (D-Birmingham) <\/strong>doubles the fee required to record mortgages, deeds of trust, and other instruments of like character. Currently, the recording fee is 15 cents for every $100 of indebtedness, with 1\/3 of the revenue retained by the county and 2\/3 of the revenue distributed to the State General Fund. Under this bill, the recording fee would be 30 cents for every $100 of indebtedness, with 19 percent retained by the county, 35 percent allocated to the State General Fund, 23 percent to the Alabama Housing Trust Fund, and 23 percent to the Alabama Homebuyers Initiative. This is the second year in a row that this legislation has been introduced. Last year, the association joined the Realtors Association and the Homebuilders Association in opposing the bill. The positions of each of these groups, including ABA, remain unchanged.<\/p>\n<p><strong>House Bill 314 <\/strong>by <strong>Rep. Ken Johnson (R-Moulton)<\/strong> and <strong>Senate Bill 249 <\/strong>by <strong>Sen. Gerald Dial (R-Lineville) <\/strong>modify the Alabama Small Loan Act. Under current law, lenders licensed under the Alabama Small Loan Act can loan up to $1,000 to a single customer at a maximum monthly interest rate of $20 and for a maximum loan term of 12 months. This bill would allow these same lenders to loan up to $1,500 to a single customer, would set the maximum monthly interest rate at $26, and would set a minimum loan term of 3 months. The House bill is in position to be debated on the House floor.<\/p>\n<p><strong>House Bill 321<\/strong> by <strong>Rep. Bob Fincher (R-Woodland)<\/strong> proposes a constitutional amendment that, if ratified, would cap the maximum interest rate on certain consumer loans, lines of credit, and other financial products at 36 percent per year. The association, along with trade groups representing every other facet of the financial services industry, is opposed to this constitutional amendment. Even though the underlying purpose behind the bill is to limit the interest rate on payday loan transactions, the amendment would apply very broadly. What\u2019s worse, if ratified, the interest rate cap would be enshrined in the constitution, making it nearly impossible to change should future economic conditions make it unfeasible to comply with the amendment. The association will monitor this legislation\u2019s progress, and we have already requested that the Campaign, Constitutions and Elections Committee hold a public hearing on the bill should they decide to consider its approval.<\/p>\n<p><strong>House Bill 355<\/strong> by <strong>Rep. Merika Coleman (D-Birmingham) <\/strong>and <strong>Senate Bill 279 <\/strong>by <strong>Sen. Shay Shelnutt (R-Trussville)<\/strong> allow banks and credit unions in Alabama to establish \u201cPrize Linked Savings Accounts,\u201d or PLSAs. Banks and credit unions that choose to establish PLSAs can create a system that encourages customers to save money in exchange for a chance to receive a reward. PLSAs are now available in nearly half of the states in the country. Both bills have been favorably reported out of committee and now await action in their houses of origin.<\/p>\n<p><strong>House Bill 456 <\/strong>by <strong>Rep. Marcel Black (D-Tuscumbia) <\/strong>would clarify that the statute of limitations for a civil action related to an open-ended credit account, including credit card debt, would be six years. This bill is in response to a debate between creditor and debtor attorneys over whether the applicable statute of limitations period is six years or three years; recent case law supports the six-year assertion.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Senate Bill 67<\/strong> by <strong>Sen. Linda Coleman-Madison (D-Birmingam) <\/strong>would adopt a process known as \u201cMandatory Unitary Combined Reporting\u201d for state income tax purposes. Though the legislation generally deals with corporate income taxpayers, banks that pay the Financial Institution Excise Tax should also be concerned by this legislation because it gives the Department of Revenue very broad discretion to combine a financial institution \u2013 even one not doing business in Alabama \u2013 with one or more Alabama corporate income taxpayers; thus the \u201cunitary\u201d nature of the process. This bill has been introduced in each of the last few regular sessions, and the Alabama Bankers Association joined nearly every other trade association representing business interests in opposing its passage. On April 5 our efforts proved successful, as the bill failed on a 2-12 vote to be favorably reported out of committee.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Senate Bill 91<\/strong> by <strong>Sen. Arthur Orr (R-Decatur)<\/strong>, the Alabama Protection and Privacy Act of 2017, would provide for the protection of sensitive personally identifying information and notice to individuals whose personal information has been breached. Alabama is one of very few states without some type of data breach notification law, and this legislation is part of the attorney genera office\u2019s 2017 legislative package. Because they must comply with similar provisions of federal law, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, financial institutions are exempt from the requirements of this bill. This bill has already been favorably reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee, and is now in position to be voted on by the full Senate.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Senate Bill 261 <\/strong>by <strong>Sen. Tom Whatley (R-Auburn)<\/strong> would provide for the regulation of consumer lawsuit lenders and consumer lawsuit lending agreements. Known as the \u201cConsumer Lawsuit Lending Act,\u201d the bill would require lenders to obtain a license from the State Banking Department and would make consumer lawsuit lending agreements subject to certain provisions of the state\u2019s Mini Code. The bill caps the finance charge of a consumer lawsuit lending agreement at 10 percent annually. The bill now awaits action on the Senate floor.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Senate Bill 284 <\/strong>by <strong>Sen. Arthur Orr (R-Decatur)<\/strong> would make numerous substantive changes to the terms, interest rates, and other charges applicable to small loans; to the terms and interest rates applicable to deferred presentment (i.e. \u201cpayday\u201d) transactions; to laws related to title pawns; and, importantly, to interest rates applicable to consumer loans. Under current law, if the principal balance of a consumer loan is $2,000 or more, the parties to the loan may agree to any interest rate that is not \u201cunconscionable,\u201d meaning unreasonably excessive. Under this bill, if the principal balance of a consumer loan is $2,000 or more, the annualized interest rate cannot exceed 60 percent (as defined by Reg. Z). The bill currently awaits a hearing before the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Senate Bill 356<\/strong> by <strong>Sen. Clay Scofield (R-Arab) <\/strong>would allow county commissions to select a financial institution as a county depository at any point during the year. Other public depositors currently have this ability, but counties are currently required to make a depository selection the first week of December for the next calendar year. This bill has been favorably reported by the Senate County and Municipal Government Committee and now awaits action on the Senate floor.<\/p>\n<p>As of this writing, a total of 502 bills have been introduced in the House of Representatives, and a total of 370 bills have been introduced in the Senate. Including bills and joint resolutions, a total of 133 measures have been enacted into law since the session began.<\/p>\n<p>The Legislature has met for 17 legislative days. The 2017 regular session can last for no more than 30 legislative days and must conclude on or before May 22.<\/p>\n<p>The House and Senate will hold its 18 legislative day on April 18.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>APRIL 13, 2017 &#8211; In the midst of one of the most tumultuous weeks in the state\u2019s history, the centerpiece of the association\u2019s 2017 legislative agenda passed the Legislature and was sent to the governor\u2019s desk. House Bill 263, which clarifies a complicated income tax regulation that applies to multi-state financial institutions, unanimously passed the Senate on Tuesday. Sponsored by Rep. Ken Johnson (R-Moulton), the bill was handled on the Senate floor by Sen. Clay Scofield (R-Arab). After the Senate added a technical amendment on the Senate floor, the bill returned to the House of Representatives, where, thanks to the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":431,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[19,26,3,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-971","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-breaking","category-capitol-notes","category-politics","category-publications","has_thumb"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/albanknews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/capitol_graphic-e1461688373563.png?fit=350%2C383&ssl=1","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4Y3P2-fF","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/albanknews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/971","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/albanknews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/albanknews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/albanknews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/albanknews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=971"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/albanknews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/971\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":975,"href":"https:\/\/albanknews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/971\/revisions\/975"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/albanknews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/431"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/albanknews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=971"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/albanknews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=971"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/albanknews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=971"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}