Unless you’re a devout student of Alabama’s legislative process, you’ve probably never heard of Senate Rule 34. Yet, among the 206 rules that govern the Alabama House and Senate, this particular rule is currently the most important rule of all.
Under normal circumstances, a Senate bill that passed the Senate before the end of the 28th legislative day could be transmitted to the House and still have a chance at becoming law. But under Senate Rule 34, no Senate bill can be transmitted to the House after the end of the 26th legislative day.
So when the Senate adjourned the 26th legislative day last Thursday, several bills designed by Senate leaders to address the funding shortfall in the State General Fund budget were effectively killed. In other words, Senate Rule 34 has all but ensured that the Legislature will meet in special session sometime this summer.
For example, Sen. Arthur Orr (R-Decatur), who chairs the Senate committee writing the FY 2016 State General Fund budget, had sought to infuse new revenue into the State General Fund by diverting some Use Tax receipts, which are normally deposited into the Education Trust Fund, into the State General Fund. According to the Legislative Fiscal Office, Orr’s bill, Senate Bill 496, would increase receipts to the State General Fund by $80 million annually. But after several attempts, the bill failed to pass the Senate on Thursday. That news, coupled with the death of some other Senate revenue bills, leaves senators with two choices: (1) pass a version of the State General Fund budget that, like the House version, drastically cuts almost every state agency, or (2) pass no budget at all.
For a variety of reasons, the latter option appears more likely. In fact, some legislative leaders have already started encouraging Gov. Bentley to plan on scheduling the session for the second half of August. What happens over the next four legislative days will determine whether a session is needed at all, so stay tuned.
As of the end of the 26th legislative day, 700 bills have been introduced in the House and 509 bills have been introduced in the Senate. A total of 275 measures have been enacted into law since the start of the session, including several joint legislative resolutions.
Some of the measures that could impact Alabama banks include the following:
Senate Bill 29, sponsored by Sen. Linda Coleman (D-Birmingham): This bill is a product of the National Consumer Law Center. Among other things, it would also void provisions in debt agreements related to out-of-state choice of laws, forum selections, and waiver of jury trials. Additionally, where defaulted debts are sold, this bill would require certain items to be included in the sale, and would set forth detailed requirements for collection of the debts. ABA and other groups oppose this legislation. The Senate Banking and Insurance Committee appointed a subcommittee to study the bill this summer.
Senate Bill 68, sponsored by Sen. Cam Ward (R-Alabaster), and House Bill 160, sponsored by Rep. Chris Pringle (R-Mobile): Known as the, “Alabama Consumer Lawsuit Lending Act,” these bills would regulate the process of consumer lawsuit lending in the state. The bill includes provisions related to consumer lawsuit lending agreements as well as interest rates applicable to those agreements (10 percent maximum, as currently written). Both bills were substituted and favorably reported in committee this week. The substitute version retained the 10 percent maximum cap. The House bill now awaits a vote by the full Senate.
Senate Bill 83, sponsored by Sen. Jimmy Holley (R-Elba), and House Bill 121, sponsored by Rep. Paul Lee (R-Dothan): These bills would prohibit the state, counties, or municipalities from using the power of eminent domain to acquire mortgages or deeds of trust. In certain states, municipalities have threatened to seize underwater mortgages and then sell them to a third-party investor. National and state banking associations, with the help of realtor and home builder groups across the country, have so far successfully prevented this activity from actually occurring. These and other groups have indicated they will support the association in providing this legislation to ensure that this type of activity never happens in Alabama. Senate Bill 83 was signed into law by Gov. Bentley and has been assigned Act No. 2015-39.
Senate Bill 106, sponsored by Sen. Arthur Orr (R-Decatur): This bill, the “Alabama Information Protection Act,” would enable Alabama to be the 48th state with some sort of data breach notification law. This bill would require specified entities, including governmental entities and third-party agents, to notify the attorney general and the individual owners of personal information upon a data security breach. This bill would also require these entities to provide notice to credit reporting agencies of security breaches of personal information involving more than 1,000 individuals. In its current form, this legislation completely exempts banks and other financial institutions from the provisions of the bill. The bill now awaits a vote by the full Senate.
Senate Bill 124, sponsored by Sen. Greg Reed (R-Jasper), and House Bill 256, sponsored by Rep. Ken Johnson (R-Moulton): As introduced, these bills would reduce from one year to 90 days the period after a foreclosure sale during which the former owner of homesteaded property could pay his debt and redeem his property. The redemption period for any other type of property would remain unchanged. The association is joining with the Alabama REALTORS Association to advocate for the passage of this bill. A Senate amendment reduced the redemption period from one year to 180 days. The amendment also required the mortgagee who forecloses residential property on which a homestead exemption was claimed during the tax year in which a foreclosure sale occurred to notify the mortgagor of his or her right to redeem the foreclosed property. A House amendment requires the redemption notification to be provided with the foreclosure notice that appears in the newspaper as well as via certified mail. Senate Bill 124 was signed into law by Gov. Bentley and has been assigned Act No. 2015-79.
Senate Bill 196, sponsored by Sen. Rodger Smitherman (D-Birmingham), and House Bill 269, sponsored by Rep. David Faulkner (R-Birmingham), would make Alabama the first state to adopt the Uniform Asset-Protection Orders Act. Among other things, this Act would make it easier for a plaintiff in a lawsuit to obtain an injunctive order to freeze the assets of the defendant in a lawsuit. Working with the Alabama Law Institute (ALI), the association has proposed numerous changes to the legislation that have been adopted by the sponsors. Both bills have been substituted and favorably reported out of committee. The substitute versions contain the language agreed upon by the association and the ALI. These bills await votes by the full House and Senate.
Senate Bill 220, sponsored by Sen. Bill Hightower (R-Mobile): This bill would allow local governments to finance loans for residential and commercial projects that purport to improve the home or building’s energy efficiency or capacity to withstand a catastrophic event. As a condition of accepting the financing, the local government would place a lien on the property. As currently written, this lien would be given priority status equal to ad valorem taxes. In other words, the lien would take priority over previous or subsequent first mortgages. The bill was substituted and favorably reported by the Senate County and Municipal Government Committee. The substitute is a product of extensive work between the association and the sponsor. As substituted, the bill applies only to commercial loan transactions, and the aforementioned lien is granted super-priority status only upon the consent of the prior lender. The bill awaits a vote by the full House.
Senate Bill 327, sponsored by Sen. Cam Ward (R-Alabaster), and House Bill 396, sponsored by Rep. Jim Hill (R-Pell City): These bills would increase the homestead and personal property exemptions granted to an individual debtor in Alabama. The current homestead exemption of $5,000 would be increased to $30,000, while the current personal property exemption of $3,000 would be increased to $10,000. These amounts would be doubled for married debtors. Nothing in these bills would preclude a financial institution from securing a waiver of these exemptions. The association is working proponents to lower the exemption rates currently in the bills. A House committee substituted the Senate bill last week to adjust the homestead exemption level to $10,000 and the personal property exemption level to $7,000. The substituted Senate bill now awaits a vote by the full House.
Senate Bill 409, sponsored by Sen. Bill Hightower (R-Mobile): This bill would reduce the state income tax rates paid by individual and corporate taxpayers, and would eliminate substantially all of the income tax exemptions currently available to these taxpayers. The state individual income tax rate would decrease from 5 percent to 2.75 percent, while the state corporate tax rate would decrease from 6.5 percent to 4.59 percent. It is the sponsor’s stated intent that the bill would result in a simpler tax return, but no increase in income tax revenue. The bill is a constitutional amendment and thus cannot be vetoed by the governor. The bill also calls for enabling legislation to be adopted by the Legislature in the future. A supermajority of legislators would have to approve the bill before it can appear on a statewide ballot. As introduced, the bill negatively impacts the banking industry because (1) it subjects banks to the state corporate income tax as well as the state’s Financial Institution Excise Tax, and (2) it increases a bank’s Financial Institution Excise Tax liability because it prevents banks from deducting federal income taxes paid from their state taxable income. The association has worked with the bill sponsor to mitigate the damage caused by the introduced bill. If the bill advances, the sponsor has agreed to add an amendment to the bill that would exempt banks from the provisions of the amendment. The bill awaits a vote by its Senate committee.
Senate Bill 430, sponsored by Sen. Slade Blackwell (R-Birmingham), and House Bill 16, sponsored by Rep. Paul Beckman (R-Prattville): Known as the “Uniform Certificate of Title for Vessels Act,” this bill would require the owner of a vessel to obtain a certificate of title on the vessel. This bill applies to transactions on or after Jan. 1, 2017. This bill is the product of extensive work done by the Alabama Law Institute. The House effectively killed the House bill recently, when a procedural vote on the House floor failed by some 18 votes. The Senate bill was amended in committee to reduce the title application fee from $50 to $25. The Senate bill awaits a vote by the full Senate.
House Bill 141, sponsored by Rep. Patricia Todd (D-Birmingham): This bill would double the fee paid to record a mortgage with a probate judge. The current fee is 15 cents for every $100 of indebtedness included on the recorded document. Receipts are currently distributed to the probate judges, the counties, and the State General Fund. If this legislation passes, a portion of the additional revenue would be distributed to the Alabama Housing Trust Fund, which was created in 2012 but has yet to receive any funding. Administered by the Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs, the Alabama Housing Trust Fund would enable non-profit groups to apply for Housing Trust Fund grants, with the grant funds going toward improving home affordability for low-income Alabamians. Several groups oppose this bill for one reason or another, and it is not likely to pass this legislative session. The bill awaits a vote by a House committee.
House Bill 201, sponsored by Rep. Lynn Greer (R-Rogersville): This legislation, part of Gov. Bentley’s tax package, would repeal Section 40-16-8, a provision of state law that gives banks a tax credit they can use to lower their Financial Institution Excise Tax liability. Established in 1935, the tax credit essentially equals the amount of sales and use taxes that a bank pays on tangible personal property used by the institution. The legislation has been referred to the House Ways and Means General Fund committee. Stopping this legislation is the association’s first priority during this legislative session. The association continues to monitor this legislation. The committee has not indicated when it will consider this legislation, if at all. The bill awaits a vote by a House committee.
House Bill 417, sponsored by Rep. Patricia Todd (D-Birmingham): This bill would codify the creation of a State Banking Department database that tracks the amount of money loaned to a customer in deferred presentment transactions. State law prohibits a customer from having outstanding deferred presentment transactions that cumulatively exceed $500. The department created this database through administrative regulation, but that decision was challenged on the grounds that creating the database in that manner exceeded the department’s legal authority. This legislation would negate that argument. The House Financial Services Committee added two technical amendments to this bill before giving it a favorable report. The bill now awaits approval by the full House. A recent Supreme Court ruling will allow for the continuation of the database created by the department through administrative regulation. Accordingly, the sponsor of this bill has indicated that she will no longer move this bill. The bill awaits a vote by a House committee.
House Bill 454, sponsored by Rep. Randy Davis (R-Daphne): This bill would allow credit unions to become qualified public depositories, thus giving those entities the ability to hold public deposits. This legislation has been introduced many times in the past. Each time, the association’s winning argument has been the same: the right to hold public deposits should not be given to a tax-exempt institution. The association will actively work to make sure this legislation never comes up for a vote. The bill awaits a vote by a House committee.
House Bill 509, sponsored by Rep. Jack Williams (R-Vestavia Hills): This bill would regulate the operation of Transportation Network Companies (TNC) in Alabama. A TNC, such as Uber or Lyft, allows individuals to offer taxi-like services without having to comply with the regulatory requirements of operating a taxi. TNC companies are gaining popularity across the country. The association is concerned that this legislation, which is based on a model bill drafted by the TNC industry, does not require sufficient insurance coverage for the automobiles used by the TNC operator, leaving the lien holder on that vehicle vulnerable to financial loss. We have discussed these concerns with the sponsor and Uber’s lobbyists. The House Commerce and Small Business Committee held a public hearing on the bill. We continue to work with the bill sponsor to address our concerns. The bill was carried over by a House committee last week, effectively killing it for the session.
So far, the Legislature has met for 26 legislative days. A Regular Legislative Session can contain no more than 30 legislative days, and all legislative days must take place on or before June 15, which is 105 days after the beginning of the session.
The House of Representatives and Senate are expected to meet for three legislative days this week (Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday) before convening for the 30th, and final, legislative day on June 11.
Questions or comments? Contact Jason Isbell, vice president of legal and governmental affairs, at jisbell@alabamabankers.com.
